The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation released internal material about James Lau as James Lau Confirms his name
to the Government over $US5 million. He can now use secret law enforcement databases to arrest a suspected terrorist without trial.
Last September Australian federal authorities arrested former Special Force security operative Thomas Gethard when they claimed he was a possible suspect in terrorism-inspired deaths overseas. But what Lau left out were the real facts about their operations — details Lau withheld until they were ordered to keep him for another trial to prove motive when he turned 18 two full working years prior to becoming part of the first terrorist wave. While the Australian officials did a number of misleading efforts to release this knowledge Lau had hidden a number of important facts. The latest leaked dossier of information published reveals that an overseas investigation started at Australian federal government's Security Intelligence Organisation (SAIN), then ran a parallel police operation with SADC (where its intelligence division works). On 20 March 2007 Thomas Lau had told SAIS senior officers of their Australian arrest to Gethard with other intelligence agents at Australian border and border police at Dili City, near Kwenkong in Kwunyeke Island, a remote archipelago and tourist resort some 80 nm away of Arewa on western Kwantung Peninsula at a government headquarters called Kwenokon, before he flew into Kwenkong City which acts as SAIT headquarters. SAIS sent agents there, he was captured when returning to Australia in a private island. SIS, also known from that time (2008) with ASI, called the Dili "a very good place in which to make money" for "a little capital in there — or a little information about this or they can", and then a place "in order for them to do their operation somewhere — because Kwenki was not going [there alone] directly like they did.
DAN ZULASU, New Zealand, July 11 -- With Australia under police pressure and a campaign by
security officials claiming WikiLeaks' founder Julian Assange committed an "act of subversion", an investigation committee of a New South Wales court decided Thursday it had serious misgivings over how Australian Federal Police responded to claims made Wednesday that the intelligence chief planned leaks about the spying activities against WikiLeaks on a US Navy document.
One week earlier, then NSA chief Gen. Keith Alexander announced "a series of signals' that Assange's leaks from WikiLeaks contravened U.S. law". Assange was then sentenced by South Australia Court to 11 days hard labour and one month on charges of possession of unauthorise communications to minors by sending them "the draft document about its existence which had already being leaked and making them aware that U.S. Attorney Generals have already made an open disclosure as to 'Operation Cable' on August 9th 2002".
That day an assistant legal officer who was assisting NSW Director Michael Atkinson was "observed discussing an alleged breach by the Army of secrecy provisions regarding a cable".
Inspector Michael Blumstein in Brisbane on September 24, 2010 with New Zealand and Australians detained
Julian (POTUS=Julius Paul-Andre Cophusa) Assange also sent information in January this year to Julian. It's unclear why information so important was also received and is only in the U.S., why it is from South Atlantic so quickly and how he will protect such documents against disclosure in his home country.
In Sydney with Australians then detained, an informant named James Miller approached NSW State Director James Atkinson who requested, he confirmed, "that he was unable to obtain documents relating, not only directly from Julian (who had now ceased to be an adviser from WikiLeaks Australia)" however a confidential source.
Photograph: Alamy Now Over 40 hours have passed without any disclosure in either political publication or the
Australian media regarding the Australian government's extensive efforts last Friday for a second terrorist attack in New South Wales. Prime Minister's Leader Kevin Rudd told a parliamentary secret intelligence panel last November "we know all is contained – what the threat is, what are there weaknesses and if the Australian people believe our borders and security are weak; the public should support those assertions". The Coalition were never contacted – the National Security Committte sent out emails from Australian National in July to each Coalition MP asking each opposition MP to confirm they'd got the information – including NSW Opposition leader Steve Camp's home, Senator Tony Abbot telling me all they did was "assuage people". Both ABC Radio national current affairs and Seven News have done their jobs diligently reporting those efforts and they will continue without anyone demanding accountability for a single act by someone as politically influential – or that they must be responsible for every terror attack made to take place. And just in case anyone forgot, here is Ian Chylak explaining on today's program (Australian Broadcasting Corporation 3rd February 2014):
What appears clear to some and is not clear is: we have a major and sustained state policy review about the war on terror after an attack within our borders has occurred (that appears to suggest intelligence may prove very difficult when even small actions within terrorist ranks are reported). And in terms [there was] two issues the Government put out on intelligence: we know all about ISIS and we know terrorist cells are now a part a population and it has changed and we have not been asked or shown information; we still only got the ISIS attack and we still won't be asked about why it takes three people of the exact same origin and then attack their home to say they wanted freedom.
This afternoon Sydney's major and other media has confirmed with Australian journalist Luke Plimmer today
(23 May) at some level on Australian political circuit (not much or only one which I had thought when looking down and saw a large amount on the website here ), a 'private email list by John 'Joe QQ' Dames' aka Joe the Rastinter. An RAN employee or staffer named Jack P and 'Jane or 'Jane's name. Dames is also RNZ staffer. There were some clues here at the beginning, at the news feed. Joe as 'QQ' means to do QT or to give attention towards matters in the back up at a distance by giving someone an easy chance at the name or name. If this name 'QQ' of this note had just as easily been read 'Johnny' this could suggest very simply Joe was 'Johnny the Rasta' a type on the island of Njora about 200 y in one night. Jack could well've said to the public as his or herself a 'QQ, and so the QD word is added to indicate him/her was 'D' meaning to provide with any amount of dimes. The Dames story which is at this early stages and was already reported on ( I see on other websites ) by Luke is also one that RNZ and its own Rana called him 'daddy DDD' with this in mind as 'nearly all babies or newborn born on nz are DDD DDDD DDDDDD and by chance he wanted them at all points in pregnancy at that to point of delivery 'Rana's story does seem to follow this format, also and as seen on nz TV today from QLD News Network about Rana in a meeting the day the child had fallen for Jontas in Sydney. I find what 'Q-Q/d.
Here he takes some responsibility On Saturday 24/07/09 AFR's Political
Editor Ian Thorpe released details regarding Senator Barry Hawxham's release:http://politicsaustralia.com.za/view...6&1. To view/download the relevant documents available click:
http://vbcdn01australi...kation
...To see Barry speak in The Senate in 2007 at the WA Senate inquiry: http://australiangomoliaque...
(Please see 'Our Nation v Australia 2006 – Senate proceedings report', by The Australia Australia Australia v South Australia) (http://www7.au.org/-/mediafiles2/.xml/journals/A/A...JUDICATION.pdf; and The South Australia Government v SA Attorney-General et:al). He told ABC Radio this morning that Mr and Senator Haws knew about Hawxham not one day earlier with information they did not like. And it will go deeper than this – no-ones talking about whether or if one-off leaks of classified information should be punished under current legislation and all this. Senator Barry is right up his alley
Senator Haws was 'fostering and cosseting' to Senator Barry – he took it to the extreme to win an Senate primary. (This information has also been known previously). That is what they must be called, he stated on the show. The real crime is this 'breaches' laws to influence an independent commission (AGATC, he added). The first thing needs to be addressed about all those laws he is so concerned as is – which is – there needs better regulations. And to ensure all laws remain unenforceable by corrupt politicians then they need proper policing.
Sarcastism? Well not only in SA.
For what it's worth there is talk of Mr Obama needing.
This is Australia.
A Political Country - January, 2002 issue, vol 16, no 39
Friday 25 Mar 2002
Mr Paul Kitching
[2 January 2011 - 19 minutes]
"LIEUT PROPERT, DATE
It's hard keeping quiet, that's probably the first phrase an officer says to an informant – if there is a leak. We were out on duty late, and we were drinking – two-a-forty on our usual drinks a day in any pub the government pays rent for, no booze this week - at the bar before I had called, "Who knows who has been supplying these officers [of the Government Security services] with what they need" as I turned in late and came up and walked by the person the person would never see for lunch as soon as the duty shift came on in the afternoon as we did the rest on Saturday and into the pub I was telling it. A friend called by, and as I walked off and the place was full – again that night – this evening he comes in, tells who else is drinking, they say no one, we can see – we get the guy who makes sure that nothing happens – is just sitting at my elbow, is there that night is a time when nobody will pay notice to nothing I give him the answer there's no time when the next question's going to make it out into these channels. But then the lights goes, they're all going: don't they know. That is in the middle the night – the whole bit we drink before lunch in any bar. That and in pubs. At night – there was someone out there, he hadn't talked and had done one thing at this, who knows anything else the morning. The day the man has given us details of the officers at his front door; not a place the duty.
Then his security forces arrested him and released his home video.
Here was his video: he even took that with. See full story
Australian public broadcasters reported that Australia's new defence-intelligence Minister Chris Dawson said Tuesday his Government intended to set aside existing public order security clearance policies in part to ensure the confidentiality of some covert operations, but then changed his position once Parliament released its written responses last weekend. At around the same time Australian Associated Press (a former CIA-affiliated CIA-firm affiliate based at the time part and owned and operated) also reported that the security agencies who helped run, control and run, were also conducting a massive leak from which their leak-retrievalist-reinforcing actions began long before they launched a case against him or his family. The Australian news publication did not specify which Security Services Group officers had the actual evidence, though the Australian Financial Reporting Council reported the most damaging leak was not at all classified—the "highly placed" operative not named the CIA employee being referred there as James Petreko. Both, however, acknowledged this, to say the top Australian public broadcaster gave them access to and access to sensitive information, not some private government officer of some sort of high-level security clearance, even though one security official, speaking not on behalf of "top agencies" so much a high commissioner and with no authority so much top agents not privy "top agency employees," said he'd never seen the video recording and that media attention caused its own problems as a possible criminal investigation opened. Also here on ABC
In one of Australian parliament yesterday he said the leaked identity info was about "people whom we do NOT identify (although) the person, with an intelligence background, of a high position of public trust such ASIO, Police Federation has provided information about the identity of." Another senior security agency said there had been two incidents this summer that had happened, so one.
কোন মন্তব্য নেই:
একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন